top of page
Promoting Harmony
Daaman
Women need to realise that beneficial laws aren't means to threaten, domineer or extort from their husbands
Rinku Baheti Vs Sandesh Sharda
Supreme Court
19/12/2024
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.278 OF 2023
About/from the judgment:
Once again expressing concerns about the misuse of domestic violence and dowry laws by disgruntled wives, the Supreme Court cautioned women not to abuse the laws which are meant for their protection.
The Court observed that more often than not, provisions like Section 498A (cruelty), 376(rape), 377(unnatural sex), and 506(criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code are invoked as a "combined package" to pressurise the husband to accede to the demands of the wife in matrimonial cases.
While dissolving a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, the bench observed :
"The provisions in the criminal law are for the protection and empowerment of women but sometimes are used by certain women more for purposes that they are never meant for. In recent times, the invocation of Sections 498A, 376, 377, 506 of the IPC as a combined package in most of the complaints related to matrimonial disputes is a practice which has been condemned by this Court on several occasions."
"In certain cases, the wife and her family tend to use a criminal complaint with all the above serious offences as a platform for negotiation and as a mechanism and a tool to get the husband and his family to comply with their demands, which are mostly monetary in nature," the Court added. Sometimes this is done in a fit of rage, while at times, it is a "planned strategy."
The Court added that the involvement of other parties and stakeholders worsens the situation, as they may often "devise such crafty strategies for the women to adopt such arm-twisting tactics for their ulterior motives." In some cases, police personnel are quick to jump into action to arrest the husband and his relatives, including aged parents and bedridden grandparents. Many often, trial courts refuse bail.
The overall effect is that minor disputes snowball into "ugly prodigious battles of ego and reputation" and "washing dirty linen in public", eventually leading to the relationship turning sour to the extent that there remains no possibility of reconciliation or cohabitation.
"The women need to be careful about the fact that these strict provisions of law in their hands are beneficial legislations for their welfare and not means to chastise, threaten, domineer or extort from their husbands," the Court advised.
Hindu marriage a sacrement
The court observed in the judgment that spouses in many cases forget that Hindu marriage is a sacrament and is considered to be a sacred institution. The observations made in Dolly Rani vs. Manish Kumar Chanchal that at Hindu Marriage is a sacred institution and should not be trivialized as a mere social event for "song and dance" and "wining and dining" were reiterated.
Read the Judgment
Knowledge and content of about almost all their respective descriptions are borrowed from law-related blogs and websites, we, therefore, wish to give proper credit to all the respective law-related blogs and websites like LiveLaw, Bar and Bench, LatestLaws, PathLegal, FirstLaw, Lawctopus, IndianKanoon, Manupatra, LegallyIndia etc.. Many of the judgments are also taken from them websites of Hon'ble Supreme Court and other respective Hon'ble High Courts!
Formats for use
bottom of page